|To:||Mitsuru KANDA <mk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: [Design] [PATCH] USAGI IPsec|
|From:||Sandy Harris <sandy@xxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Mon, 21 Oct 2002 07:46:16 -0700|
|Cc:||linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, cryptoapi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx, design@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0|
Mitsuru KANDA wrote:
Is this code being checked in to the mainline kernel? Or becoming part of theHello Linux kernel network maintainers, I'm a member of USAGI project. In IPv6 specifications, IPsec is mandatory. We implemented IPsec for Linux IP stack. At present, our implementation includes: PF_KEY V2 interface, Security Association Database and Security Policy Database for whole IP versions, IPsec for IPv6,(transport, tunnel mode), IPsec for IPv4 (transport mode), Would you mind checking it ?
CryptoAPI patch set? Bravo, in either case. How does that affect FreeS/WAN development?
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: tulip NAPI patch that works with 2.4.20-pre9 or so?, Ben Greear|
|Next by Date:||Re: [Design] [PATCH] USAGI IPsec, David S. Miller|
|Previous by Thread:||[PATCH] USAGI IPsec, Mitsuru KANDA|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [Design] [PATCH] USAGI IPsec, David S. Miller|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|