netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Design] [PATCH] USAGI IPsec

from [Sandy Harris] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Mitsuru KANDA <mk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Design] [PATCH] USAGI IPsec
From: Sandy Harris <sandy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 07:46:16 -0700
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, cryptoapi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx, design@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <m3k7kpjt7c.wl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 
Mitsuru KANDA wrote:


Hello Linux kernel network maintainers,

I'm a member of USAGI project.

In IPv6 specifications, IPsec is mandatory.

We implemented IPsec for Linux IP stack.

At present, our implementation includes:
        PF_KEY V2 interface,
        Security Association Database and
        Security Policy Database for whole IP versions,
        IPsec for IPv6,(transport, tunnel mode),
        IPsec for IPv4 (transport mode),

Would you mind checking it ?
Is this code being checked in to the mainline kernel? Or becoming part of the 
CryptoAPI patch set? Bravo, in either case.

How does that affect FreeS/WAN development?
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: tulip NAPI patch that works with 2.4.20-pre9 or so?, Ben Greear
Next by Date:  Re: [Design] [PATCH] USAGI IPsec, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:  [PATCH] USAGI IPsec, Mitsuru KANDA
Next by Thread:  Re: [Design] [PATCH] USAGI IPsec, David S. Miller
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]