| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) |
| From: | Jonathan Lundell <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Oct 2002 19:54:15 -0700 |
| Cc: | "'Ben Greear'" <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20021015043722.A9562@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <288F9BF66CD9D5118DF400508B68C44604758B78@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021015043722.A9562@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 4:37am +0200 10/15/02, Andi Kleen wrote: > Ben, I checked the datasheet for the part shown in the lspci dump, and itshows an operating temperature of 0-55 degrees C. You said you measured 50 degrees C, so you're within the safe range. Did the fans help?The thermometer he used likely showed a much lower temperature than what was actually on the die. 5-10 C more are not unlikely. It's hard to measure chip temperatures accurately without an on die thermal diode or special kit. So I would expect that when an external normal thermometer showed 50C it was already operating out of spec. The datasheet's for the card, so the operating temperature is surely ambient, not die temperature. "Ambient measured how?" would be a reasonable question, though. -- /Jonathan Lundell. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!), Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Signal interrupt with connect., Geoffrey Lee |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!), Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!), Dave Hansen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |