| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses |
| From: | Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:00:34 +0900 |
| Cc: | dfawcus@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20021009.164504.28085695.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Keio University |
| References: | <20021010002902.A3803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021009.162438.82081593.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <uu1jv9o3j.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021009.164504.28085695.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Wanderlust/2.8.1 (Something) SEMI/1.14.4 (Hosorogi) FLIM/1.14.4 (Kashiharajingū-mae) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (i386-*-nt5.1.2600) MULE/4.1 (AOI) Meadow/1.15pre1-IPv6 (SHOUBU:63) |
At Wed, 09 Oct 2002 16:45:04 -0700 (PDT),
** David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The reason we change the prefix length from /10 to /64 is
> following spec and adapting other imprementations.
>
> I think Derek's explanation shows that the specification
> allows the /10 behavior.
Hmm... we interpret the spec as /64 prefix.
> Also, I suspect that since Derek works for Cisco, some "other
> implementations" behave how he describes. :-)
I have cisco box which installed IPv6 IOS.
But it defines no prefix length at an interface,
FastEthernet4/1 is up, line protocol is up
IPv6 is enabled, link-local address is FE80::201:64FF:FEA3:ED55
and outgoing interface of routing table is NULL ? :-)
L FE80::/10 [0/0]
via ::, Null0, 7w0d
-- Yuji Sekiya
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses, Derek Fawcus |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses, Derek Fawcus |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |