| To: | dfawcus@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 09 Oct 2002 16:24:38 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20021010002902.A3803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20021009234421.J29133@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021009.161414.63434223.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20021010002902.A3803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Derek Fawcus <dfawcus@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:29:02 +0100 There are areas where the TAHI tests expect a certain behaviour when more than one behaviour is acceptable. Great, that's what I was trying to find out. Now I just need to know if this link-local prefix case is one such issue. :-) |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses, Derek Fawcus |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses, Derek Fawcus |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses, Derek Fawcus |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses, Derek Fawcus |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |