[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses

To: davem@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 09:37:21 +0900 (JST)
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20021007.115530.00078126.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <20021008.000559.17528416.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021007.115530.00078126.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <20021007.115530.00078126.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Mon, 07 Oct 2002 
11:55:30 -0700 (PDT)), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> BTW, we start to run into conflicts now and most of USAGI patches now
> I need to apply some parts by hand.  Here is one example, with this
> patch:
> It is not such a big deal now, but it may soon become larger as
> bigger USAGI patches are applied.  We will need to synchronize
> at some point.


So,... What kind of patches do you prefer, now?

 - on top of plain kernel (2.4.19, 2.4.20, 2.4.21-preXX, or whatever)
 - plain kernel + on top of our whole patch?
 - ???

Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>