| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: VLAN patches |
| From: | Eran Mann <emann@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 07 Oct 2002 09:32:46 +0200 |
| Cc: | greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, Bjorn.Andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20021006.194654.35505461.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3DA1010A.8020202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3DA13332.4080109@xxxxxxx> <20021007.000627.50595749.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 |
David S. Miller wrote: From: Eran Mann Regarding the 0 VID it is indeed used for priority-only frames. Shouldn't it be supported by alowing the user to configure a priority map for the ethernet device (rather than creating another user-visible device?I don't have any opinion about this, besides the fact that if the device based interface we have now can do whatever the user wants we should not add a new configuration mechanism just to provide some alias that effectively accomplishes the same task. I was thinking more in the line of: # vconfig set_egress_map eth0 XX YY etc... (once CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q=y|m ofcourse) -- Eran Mann Senior Software Engineer MRV International Tel: 972-4-9936297 Fax: 972-4-9890430 www.mrv.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: VLAN patches, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender -goldfish, Mail Delivery System |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: VLAN patches, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: VLAN patches, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |