| To: | emann@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: VLAN patches |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 07 Oct 2002 00:06:27 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, Bjorn.Andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3DA13332.4080109@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20021006.194654.35505461.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3DA1010A.8020202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3DA13332.4080109@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Eran Mann <emann@xxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 09:09:38 +0200 Regarding the 0 VID it is indeed used for priority-only frames. Shouldn't it be supported by alowing the user to configure a priority map for the ethernet device (rather than creating another user-visible device? I don't have any opinion about this, besides the fact that if the device based interface we have now can do whatever the user wants we should not add a new configuration mechanism just to provide some alias that effectively accomplishes the same task. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: VLAN patches, Eran Mann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: VLAN patches, Eran Mann |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: VLAN patches, Eran Mann |
| Next by Thread: | Re: VLAN patches, Eran Mann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |