| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: VLAN patches |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:47:50 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Bjorn.Andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20021005.220549.15266753.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, David S. Miller wrote: > I think we should, please submit a patch which denies it on > both config and delete. > A packet with VLANid 0 and an 802.1p tag > 0 is legal. I think its known as a "priority tagged" packet (not 100% sure about the term). Therefore VLANid 0 MUST be accepted and ability to send it should be there. BTW, what about VLANid 0xFFF? cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!), jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!), Andre Hedrick |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: VLAN patches, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: VLAN patches, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |