On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > tcp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.53 *.* LISTEN
> > tcp4 0 0 22.214.171.124.53 *.* LISTEN
> > tcp4 0 0 126.96.36.199.53 *.* LISTEN
> > tcp6 0 0 *.53 *.* LISTEN
> > Will this work too?
> The question follows: what the hell does it make this? What is special
> in ipv4 that it needs to bind to its addresses? With IPV6_V6ONLY connections
> to all the IPv4 addresses but listed ones will be refused. I guess it is
> not _that_ thing which bind expects.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Note that the last line is
tcp6 0 0 *.53 *.* LISTEN
So, I belive using IPV6_V6ONLY it should indeed work.
(The reasoning in Bind is that you can bind to addresses _only_ in IPv4
but you don't have to. It's done in these cases. For IPv6, it's
Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords