netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FreeSWAN's pfkey_v2.c

To: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FreeSWAN's pfkey_v2.c
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:58:07 -0400
Cc: design@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 17 Oct 2002 04:50:54 +0200." <20021017045054.A405@wotan.suse.de>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> "Andi" == Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> writes:
    >> I am looking for confirmation from network stack people that my
    >> conclusions from reading of the macros in linux/net.h is correct.

    Andi> What you should actually do is to add explicit proper SMP locking.
    Andi> Then you don't need any SOCKOPS_WRAP hacks.

  Yes, that's a good idea, but it doesn't help me understand the code.

]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>