netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] USAGI IPsec

To: ahu@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USAGI IPsec
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 04:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20021012111759.GA10104@outpost.ds9a.nl>
References: <20021012.114330.78212112.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20021011.194108.102576152.davem@redhat.com> <20021012111759.GA10104@outpost.ds9a.nl>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
   From: bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>
   Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 13:17:59 +0200

   On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 07:41:08PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
   > We believe that the whole SPD/SAD mechanism should move
   > eventually to a top-level flow cache shared by ipv4 and
   > ipv6.
   
   Is this the proposed stacked route system?

Yes, for output mostly.

Also the idea Alexey and I have to move towards a small
efficient flow cache shared by IPv4/IPv6 plays into this
as well.  There are changesets on their way to Linus tonight
which moves ipv4 over to using ipv6's "struct flowi" from
include/net/flow.h as the routing lookup key.

The initial ipsec is intended to be simple, singly linked
lists for the spd/sad databases etc.  Making the feature
freeze is pretty important right now, full blown flow cache
is just performance improvement :)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>