The Linux Network Development List (thread)

Need to build my own protocol handler..., Markus Adolfsson, 2002/10/01
- Re: Need to build my own protocol handler..., Ben Greear, 2002/10/01
RFC: cleaning up struct sk_buff before halloween, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, 2002/09/30
- Re: RFC: cleaning up struct sk_buff before halloween, David S. Miller, 2002/09/30
  - Re: RFC: cleaning up struct sk_buff before halloween, acme, 2002/10/01
Copy patch for kernel 2.5.38, Mala Anand, 2002/09/30
- Re: Copy patch for kernel 2.5.38, Andrew Morton, 2002/09/30
RE: [VLAN] VLAN patches, Dave Santucci, 2002/09/30
- Re: [VLAN] VLAN patches, Ben Greear, 2002/09/30
Network interrupt pause problem in 2.5.38 kernel, Mala Anand, 2002/09/30
Quixtar help, from me!, ur_business, 2002/09/30
VLAN patches, Andersson Björn, 2002/09/30
- Re: [VLAN] VLAN patches, Matti Aarnio, 2002/09/30
  - Re: [VLAN] VLAN patches, Ben Greear, 2002/09/30
ipv6 implementation status ?, Seong Moon, 2002/09/30
- ipv6 implementation status ?, Seong Moon, 2002/09/30
(ad)Strong WebRobot/eMailId Collector: Free Download !, herald, 2002/09/29
[BK/GNU] net driver 2.4.x series 7, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/29
[BK/GNU] net driver 2.4.x series 8, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/29
[BK PATCH] Make eth.c independent of dev->hard_header_len, Kai Germaschewski, 2002/09/29
- Re: [BK PATCH] Make eth.c independent of dev->hard_header_len, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/29
  - Re: [BK PATCH] Make eth.c independent of dev->hard_header_len, Kai Germaschewski, 2002/09/29
    - Re: [BK PATCH] Make eth.c independent of dev->hard_header_len, David S. Miller, 2002/09/29
    - Re: [BK PATCH] Make eth.c independent of dev->hard_header_len, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/29
- Re: [BK PATCH] Make eth.c independent of dev->hard_header_len, David S. Miller, 2002/09/29
Apresentação, Remover, 2002/09/28
Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Richard Gooch, 2002/09/28
- Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Xiaoliang $David$ Wei, 2002/09/28
  - Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Richard Gooch, 2002/09/29
    - Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Benjamin LaHaise, 2002/09/29
    - Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Richard Gooch, 2002/09/29
- Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Ben Greear, 2002/09/28
  - Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Richard Gooch, 2002/09/29
    - Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Ben Greear, 2002/09/29
    - Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Richard Gooch, 2002/09/29
    - RE: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Jon Fraser, 2002/09/30
[PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 2002/09/28
- Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, kuznet, 2002/09/28
  - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, David S. Miller, 2002/09/28
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, Andi Kleen, 2002/09/28
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, kuznet, 2002/09/28
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, David S. Miller, 2002/09/29
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, kuznet, 2002/09/30
  - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, David S. Miller, 2002/09/29
Re: [PATCH] khttpd crash fix, Marcelo Tosatti, 2002/09/27
- Re: [PATCH] khttpd crash fix, Marcelo Tosatti, 2002/09/27
[PATCH] migrate ioctls upwards, Matthew Wilcox, 2002/09/27
[PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 2002/09/27
- Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 2002/09/27
  - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, Pekka Savola, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 2002/09/27
- Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, David S. Miller, 2002/09/27
  - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, Andi Kleen, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, David S. Miller, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, David S. Miller, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, David S. Miller, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 2002/09/28
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 2002/09/28
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, Pekka Savola, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 2002/09/28
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, Pekka Savola, 2002/09/28
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 2002/09/28
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, Pekka Savola, 2002/09/29
Linux problems with hundreds of interfaces/routes, Petr Baudis, 2002/09/27
- Re: Linux problems with hundreds of interfaces/routes, kuznet, 2002/09/27
  - Re: Linux problems with hundreds of interfaces/routes, Petr Baudis, 2002/09/27
[PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 2002/09/27
- Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer, David S. Miller, 2002/09/27
  - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer, kuznet, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer, kuznet, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer, David S. Miller, 2002/09/27
Any effort to try to make IPv6 API more uniform?, Pekka Savola, 2002/09/27
- Re: Any effort to try to make IPv6 API more uniform?, Michael Richardson, 2002/09/27
netlink sockets and rtm_newlink messages, Patrick R. McManus, 2002/09/26
- Re: netlink sockets and rtm_newlink messages, Patrick R. McManus, 2002/09/27
  - Re: netlink sockets and rtm_newlink messages, jamal, 2002/09/27
  - Re: netlink sockets and rtm_newlink messages, kuznet, 2002/09/27
    - Re: netlink sockets and rtm_newlink messages, jamal, 2002/09/29
    - Re: netlink sockets and rtm_newlink messages, kuznet, 2002/09/30
[no subject], mdews, 2002/09/26
Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification for Netfilter, James Morris, 2002/09/26
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification for Netfilter, James R. Leu, 2002/09/26
  - Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification for Netfilter, James Morris, 2002/09/26
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification for Netfilter, David S. Miller, 2002/09/26
  - Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification for Netfilter, Michael Richardson, 2002/09/26
  - Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification for Netfilter, jamal, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification for Netfilter, David S. Miller, 2002/09/27
TR : Bug with NIC card Adlink PCI 8214 (Intel 82559 based) under linux, Gautier Harmel, 2002/09/26
Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification, jamal, 2002/09/26
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification, Roberto Nibali, 2002/09/26
  - Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification, jamal, 2002/09/27
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification, Roberto Nibali, 2002/09/26
SPECWeb99 Data -- tcp-wakeups, Troy Wilson, 2002/09/25
[PATCH] IPv6: Don't Process ND Messages with Invalid Options, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 2002/09/25
- Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Don't Process ND Messages with Invalid Options, David S. Miller, 2002/09/26
[Question] SMP for TCP/IP Stack, Hyochang Nam, 2002/09/24
- Re: [Question] SMP for TCP/IP Stack, Benjamin LaHaise, 2002/09/24
- Re: [Question] SMP for TCP/IP Stack, Ben Greear, 2002/09/24
- Re: [Question] SMP for TCP/IP Stack, Nivedita Singhvi, 2002/09/25
udp weirdness, Eric Lemoine, 2002/09/24
- Re: udp weirdness, Eric Lemoine, 2002/09/27
  - Re: udp weirdness, jamal, 2002/09/27
    - Re: udp weirdness, Matti Aarnio, 2002/09/27
    - Re: udp weirdness, jamal, 2002/09/29
    - Re: udp weirdness, Eric Lemoine, 2002/09/30
    - Re: udp weirdness, jamal, 2002/09/30
    - Re: udp weirdness, jamal, 2002/09/30
    - Re: udp weirdness, jamal, 2002/09/30
    - PATCH Re: udp weirdness, jamal, 2002/09/30
    - Re: PATCH Re: udp weirdness, Eric Lemoine, 2002/10/01
    - Re: udp weirdness, Eric Lemoine, 2002/09/27
    - Re: udp weirdness, Eric Lemoine, 2002/09/28
skb->len, Mazhar Memon, 2002/09/23
- Re: skb->len, David S. Miller, 2002/09/23
Ricerca e Selezione, info, 2002/09/23
ALTPATCH: 8139cp: LinkChg support, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/20
- Re: ALTPATCH: 8139cp: LinkChg support, Felipe W Damasio, 2002/09/20
  - Re: ALTPATCH: 8139cp: LinkChg support, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/20
Translation services - Services de traduction, Deborah CABESSA, 2002/09/19
- Re: Translation services - Services de traduction, Cedric Edwards, 2002/09/19
help !, den, 2002/09/19
Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c cleanups, Richard Gooch, 2002/09/18
- Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c cleanups, Jason Lunz, 2002/09/18
  - [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c update, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/18
    - Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c update, Jason Lunz, 2002/09/18
    - Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c update, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/19
    - Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c update, Donald Becker, 2002/09/19
    - PATCH: sundance #2, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/19
    - Re: PATCH: sundance #2, Donald Becker, 2002/09/19
    - PATCH: sundance #3, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/19
    - Re: PATCH: sundance #2, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/19
    - PATCH: sundance #4, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/19
    - PATCH: sundance #4a, Jason Lunz, 2002/09/19
    - Re: PATCH: sundance #4a, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/19
    - PATCH: sundance #4b, Jason Lunz, 2002/09/19
    - Re: PATCH: sundance #4b, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/19
    - PATCH: sundance #5 (variable per-interface MTU support), Jason Lunz, 2002/09/19
    - Re: PATCH: sundance #5 (variable per-interface MTU support), Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/19
    - Re: PATCH: sundance #5 (variable per-interface MTU support), Donald Becker, 2002/09/19
    - PATCH: [my] sundance #5, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/19
    - PATCH: sundance #6, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/19
  - Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c cleanups, Richard Gooch, 2002/09/19
    - Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c cleanups, Keith Owens, 2002/09/19
- Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c cleanups, Donald Becker, 2002/09/19
PATCH Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jay Vosburgh, 2002/09/18
- Re: PATCH Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/18
- Re: PATCH Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jay Vosburgh, 2002/09/18
  - Re: PATCH Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/18
[PATCH] pktgen (link to non-busted patch this time), Ben Greear, 2002/09/18
[PATCH] Networking: send-to-self, Ben Greear, 2002/09/18
- Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self, David S. Miller, 2002/09/18
- Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self, Ben Greear, 2002/09/18
- Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time], Ben Greear, 2002/09/18
  - Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time], David S. Miller, 2002/09/18
    - Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time], Ben Greear, 2002/09/18
    - Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time], David S. Miller, 2002/09/18
    - Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time], Ben Greear, 2002/09/18
    - Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time], David S. Miller, 2002/09/18
    - Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time], Ben Greear, 2002/09/18
    - Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this, kuznet, 2002/09/26
    - Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this, Ben Greear, 2002/09/26
    - Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this, kuznet, 2002/09/26
    - Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this, Ben Greear, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this, kuznet, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this, Ben Greear, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this, kuznet, 2002/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this, Ben Greear, 2002/09/27
[PATCH] pktgen (1.6,-ben), Ben Greear, 2002/09/18
FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Martin Pool, 2002/09/17
- Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, David S. Miller, 2002/09/17
  - Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Martin Pool, 2002/09/17
    - Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Alexey Kuznetsov, 2002/09/18
    - Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Martin Pool, 2002/09/26
    - Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, kuznet, 2002/09/26
    - Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, David S. Miller, 2002/09/26
    - Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Martin Pool, 2002/09/30
    - Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, David S. Miller, 2002/09/30
    - Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Alan Cox, 2002/09/30
  - Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Martin Pool, 2002/09/17
[Fwd: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads], Andrew Morton, 2002/09/17
Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jay Vosburgh, 2002/09/17
Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Manfred Spraul, 2002/09/17
- Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Andrew Morton, 2002/09/17
  - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, David S. Miller, 2002/09/17
    - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/17
    - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, David S. Miller, 2002/09/17
    - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/17
    - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, David S. Miller, 2002/09/17
    - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/17
    - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Andrew Morton, 2002/09/17
    - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, jamal, 2002/09/17
    - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, David S. Miller, 2002/09/17
    - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Andrew Morton, 2002/09/17
    - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Eric W. Biederman, 2002/09/18
    - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Alan Cox, 2002/09/18
    - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Eric W. Biederman, 2002/09/19
    - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, David S. Miller, 2002/09/18
    - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Alan Cox, 2002/09/18
    - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, David S. Miller, 2002/09/18
    - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Alan Cox, 2002/09/18
    - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, David S. Miller, 2002/09/18
    - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Eric W. Biederman, 2002/09/19
    - Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Alan Cox, 2002/09/19
RE: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPU load, Cureington, Tony, 2002/09/17
- Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPU load, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/17
  - Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Andrew Morton, 2002/09/17
    - Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Chad N. Tindel, 2002/09/17
    - Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/17
    - Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Chad N. Tindel, 2002/09/17
    - Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/17
    - Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/17
    - Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Andrew Morton, 2002/09/17
    - Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Andrew Morton, 2002/09/17
- RE: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPU load, Jay Vosburgh, 2002/09/17
- Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPU load, Jay Vosburgh, 2002/09/17
  - Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPU load, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/17
Networking, Facey Brian, 2002/09/16
unregister_netdevice, usage count = 0, Ben Greear, 2002/09/15
Re: packet re-ordering on SMP machines., Harald Welte, 2002/09/15
- Re: packet re-ordering on SMP machines., Alexey Kuznetsov, 2002/09/15
[PATCH] Enable sending network traffic to local machine over external interfaces., Ben Greear, 2002/09/15
- Re: [PATCH] Enable sending network traffic to local machine over external interfaces., jamal, 2002/09/15
  - Re: [PATCH] Enable sending network traffic to local machine over external interfaces., Ben Greear, 2002/09/15
Bonding driver unreliable under high CPU load, Pascal Brisset, 2002/09/14
- Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPU load, Andrew Morton, 2002/09/14
TCP connection establishment question (send to self), Ben Greear, 2002/09/14
US$ 6 Millones!!!, El Mensajero Millonario, 2002/09/13
RFC 3041, Stephen Waters, 2002/09/13
- Re: RFC 3041, Peter Bieringer, 2002/09/14
more on forcing traffic to route to local interface though another interface., Ben Greear, 2002/09/12
Make $20,000 with PayPal! Fast, reliable,FREE!!!, Your Friend, 2002/09/12
bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Boris Protopopov, 2002/09/12
- Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, David S. Miller, 2002/09/12
  - Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Chris Friesen, 2002/09/13
    - Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Cacophonix, 2002/09/13
    - Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Chris Friesen, 2002/09/16
    - Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Ben Greear, 2002/09/16
    - Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, David S. Miller, 2002/09/16
    - Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Chris Friesen, 2002/09/16
    - Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, David S. Miller, 2002/09/16
    - Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Chris Friesen, 2002/09/16
    - Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, David S. Miller, 2002/09/16
    - Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, jamal, 2002/09/17
    - Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Ben Greear, 2002/09/17
    - Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, jamal, 2002/09/17
    - Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Ben Greear, 2002/09/17
    - Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, jamal, 2002/09/18
- RE: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Feldman, Scott, 2002/09/12
  - Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Boris Protopopov, 2002/09/13
- RE: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Yan-Fa Li, 2002/09/16
[PATCH] ebtables - Ethernet bridge tables, for 2.5.34, Bart De Schuymer, 2002/09/12
What happened with your forms processing idea?, Steve Kelly, 2002/09/10
Japanese girl VS playboy, debian-hurd, 2002/09/09
[no subject], Mala Anand, 2002/09/09
IPV6_LEAVE_GROUP with ipv6mr_interface=0, Michael Bussmann, 2002/09/09
Driver for TI ACX100 based card?, Ralf Baechle, 2002/09/08
A WinXP patch, support, 2002/09/07
URGENT ASSISTANCE, EDWARD MULETE, 2002/09/07
New York Remembrance 911, Irmingard Anna, 2002/09/06
linux 2.2 TCP_CORK FIN_WAIT1 reproducible bug, Martin Pool, 2002/09/06
Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Troy Wilson, 2002/09/05
- Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, jamal, 2002/09/05
  - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Troy Wilson, 2002/09/05
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 2002/09/05
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Dave Hansen, 2002/09/05
  - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 2002/09/05
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, jamal, 2002/09/05
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 2002/09/05
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/05
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 2002/09/05
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/05
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Troy Wilson, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/05
  - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/05
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Andrew Morton, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, jamal, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Dave Hansen, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Dave Hansen, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Dave Hansen, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Andi Kleen, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Dave Hansen, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Andi Kleen, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Gerrit Huizenga, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Gerrit Huizenga, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Gerrit Huizenga, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Alan Cox, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Gerrit Huizenga, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Gerrit Huizenga, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Gerrit Huizenga, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Troy Wilson, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Eric W. Biederman, 2002/09/11
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 2002/09/11
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Eric W. Biederman, 2002/09/11
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/11
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Eric W. Biederman, 2002/09/11
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 2002/09/11
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Todd Underwood, 2002/09/12
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, jamal, 2002/09/12
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Todd Underwood, 2002/09/12
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Alan Cox, 2002/09/12
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, todd-lkml, 2002/09/12
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/12
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, todd-lkml, 2002/09/13
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 2002/09/13
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/13
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, jamal, 2002/09/15
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/15
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, todd-lkml, 2002/09/16
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/16
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, todd-lkml, 2002/09/16
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/16
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David Woodhouse, 2002/09/16
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/16
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David Woodhouse, 2002/09/16
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/16
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/16
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/16
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/16
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Jeff Garzik, 2002/09/16
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, jamal, 2002/09/17
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 2002/09/12
  - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Troy Wilson, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Troy Wilson, 2002/09/06
- RE: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Feldman, Scott, 2002/09/05
- Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Robert Olsson, 2002/09/06
  - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Robert Olsson, 2002/09/06
- Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Manfred Spraul, 2002/09/06
  - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Manfred Spraul, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 2002/09/06
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Robert Olsson, 2002/09/10
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Manfred Spraul, 2002/09/10
    - Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Robert Olsson, 2002/09/11
- Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Mala Anand, 2002/09/10
Discounted Hotel Rooms, Discount Hotel Rooms, 2002/09/04
"Loopback" route through two cards?, Rusty Russell, 2002/09/03
- Re: "Loopback" route through two cards?, jamal, 2002/09/03
  - Re: "Loopback" route through two cards?, Eric Lemoine, 2002/09/04
- Re: "Loopback" route through two cards?, kuznet, 2002/09/03
  - Re: "Loopback" route through two cards?, Ben Greear, 2002/09/12
    - Re: "Loopback" route through two cards?, Ben Greear, 2002/09/13
Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization, Mala Anand, 2002/09/02
IPv6 MTU of a tunnel: 2 different switches, which wins?, Peter Bieringer, 2002/09/02