| To: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx (David S. Miller) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:56:36 +0400 (MSD) |
| Cc: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20020928.231915.113302934.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> from "David S. Miller" at Sep 28, 2 11:19:15 pm |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > Oh I see... perhaps you imply I should destroy CONFIG_RT6_POLICY > remnants as well? :-) Yes, the bits in route.c must be killed. But I would prefer to preserve subtrees support in ip6_fib.c. It is... well, it really constrains hacking, but in a useful manner, not allowing to forget that a radix node may open second level lookup. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Network interrupt pause problem in 2.5.38 kernel, Mala Anand |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: netlink sockets and rtm_newlink messages, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |