netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case
From: Martin Pool <mbp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 19:59:10 +1000
Cc: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Alan.Cox@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20020926.134608.31605412.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20020926054721.GA6039@xxxxxxxxx> <200209261309.RAA17837@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020926.134608.31605412.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On 26 Sep 2002, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>    From: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 17:09:11 +0400 (MSD)
> 
>    I do not understand why tcp_push_pending_frames() was not used
>    there... maybe, there was some reason not to use it.
>    
>    Dave, do you not remember this?

So where does this leave us?  

Was the patch we came up with correct?  It looks reasonable to me, but
I don't know the stack well enough to be sure.  I think it would be
nice if it could be fixed in 2.2.

Let me know if there's anything I can do by way of testing, etc.

-- 
Martin 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>