netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router

from [kuznet] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: davem@xxxxxxxxxx (David S. Miller)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router
From: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 06:09:52 +0400 (MSD)
Cc: yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20020928.172306.102654240.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> from "David S. Miller" at Sep 28, 2 05:23:06 pm
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
Hello!

> This reminds me, nothing is aparently going to make use
> of net/ipv6/ip6_fw.c, it sits unused and untouched for
> years, 

... and unwritten. :-)

> can we just detroy it? :-)

Must, I think.

Though with your current mood about per-flow cache the file
could deserve... mmm... post-mortem examination. :-)

Alexey
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, Andi Kleen
Next by Date:  Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Xiaoliang \(David\) Wei
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, Andi Kleen
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, David S. Miller
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]