netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router

from [Andi Kleen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 04:08:22 +0200
Cc: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20020928.172306.102654240.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20020928.151959.131438421.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200209282047.AAA03890@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020928.172306.102654240.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i 
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 05:23:06PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
>    From: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 00:47:05 +0400 (MSD)
> 
>    One question, what is this chunk for?
> 
> This reminds me, nothing is aparently going to make use
> of net/ipv6/ip6_fw.c, it sits unused and untouched for
> years, can we just detroy it? :-)

It never worked correctly and was unfinished. I would destroy it.

-Andi
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, David S. Miller
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, kuznet
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, David S. Miller
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, kuznet
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]