| To: | greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ben Greear) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Sep 2002 07:36:02 +0400 (MSD) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3D93B4CB.8040905@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Ben Greear" at Sep 26, 2 06:30:51 pm |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > Think about this: Suppose you are connecting to a listening socket that has > been > bound to a device. That creates the the temporary socket structure > on the receive side, That does _not_. All transmits use listening socket structure. > can get routed based on the parent's bound_dev_if if my assumption here is > not correct. Find function tcp_v4_send_synack(), then tcp_v4_route_req() and derive that your modifications have exactly zero impact on it, sk->bound_dev_if is setup and used exactly like it was used before. Alexey |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification for Netfilter, Michael Richardson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Any effort to try to make IPv6 API more uniform?, Pekka Savola |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this, Ben Greear |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this, Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |