| To: | greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time] |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Sep 2002 19:01:17 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3D893165.10106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3D890A51.7000103@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020918.182855.47438220.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3D893165.10106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 19:07:33 -0700 David S. Miller wrote: > I mean put the ifdefs in a header file such as tcp.h, not in the *.c > code. Would you object to me just removing all of them and having the patch unconditionally compiled in? Your comments say that SIOCBINDTODEVICE behavior is changed, how can we legitimately do that all the time without breaking apps? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time], Ben Greear |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time], Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time], Ben Greear |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time], Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |