| To: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Sep 2002 07:48:42 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | Chris Friesen <cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Cacophonix <cacophonix@xxxxxxxxx>, <linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3D87FBD5.3030508@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Ben Greear wrote: > I see reordering on regular old socket calls from user space, and I see > the same thing with pktgen packets as well (which clears the stack of fault). > > > Did you get reordering with affinity? > > Yes. I'm not sure I tried affinity w/out NAPI though. I definately tried > it with NAPI and saw reordering. > Ok, now it is getting interesting. I would start to be suspicious about either the hardware or driver. Please try without NAPI and affinity and post what you see (not that this result matters but should help confirn things). cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] pktgen (link to non-busted patch this time), Ben Greear |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Eric W. Biederman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Ben Greear |
| Next by Thread: | RE: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Feldman, Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |