| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Sep 2002 06:31:03 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <todd-lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <tcw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <pfeather@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20020916.125211.82482173.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002, David S. Miller wrote: > From: todd-lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 08:16:47 -0600 (MDT) > > are there any standards in progress to support this. > > Your question makes no sense, it is a hardware optimization > of an existing standard. The chip merely is told what flows > exist and it concatenates TCP data from consequetive packets > for that flow if they arrive in sequence. > Hrm. Again, the big Q: How "thmart" is this NIC going to be (think congestion control and the du-jour flavor). cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |