| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 |
| From: | David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Sep 2002 23:53:00 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, todd-lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, tcw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, pfeather@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20020916.142931.126209536.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20020916.142931.126209536.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20020916.125211.82482173.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209161528140.13850-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
davem@xxxxxxxxxx said: > new system calls into the networking code > The system calls would go into the VFS, sys_receivefile is not > networking specific in any way shape or form. Er, surely the same goes for sys_sendfile? Why have a new system call rather than just swapping the 'in' and 'out' fds? -- dwmw2 |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |