| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation |
| From: | Chris Friesen <cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Sep 2002 10:29:31 -0400 |
| Cc: | linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <3D80DF4F.5B218F19@xxxxxx> <20020912.163447.131926830.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
"David S. Miller" wrote: > > Bonding does not help with single stream performance. > You have to have multiple apps generating multiple streams > of data before you'll realize any improvement. > Therefore netpipe is a bad test for what you're doing. This has always confused me. Why doesn't the bonding driver try and spread all the traffic over all the links? This would allow for a single stream to use the full aggregate bandwidth of all bonded links. Chris |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RFC 3041, Stephen Waters |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Boris Protopopov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Cacophonix |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |