| To: | gh@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:34:48 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | Martin.Bligh@xxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, tcw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, niv@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <E17nNhM-0003PD-00@w-gerrit2> |
| References: | <20020906.103717.82432404.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <E17nNhM-0003PD-00@w-gerrit2> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Gerrit Huizenga <gh@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:19:11 -0700 And, honestly, I'm a kernel guy much more than an applications guy, so I'll admit that I'm not up to speed on what Tux2 can do with dynamic content. TUX can optimize dynamic content just fine. The last I knew was that it could pass it off to another server. Not true. The problem is that performance on Apache sucks but people like the features. Tux's design allows it to be a drop in acceleration method which does not require you to relinquish Apache's feature set. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Manfred Spraul |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Alan Cox |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Gerrit Huizenga |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |