The Linux Network Development List (date)

The Linux Network Development List (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

October 01, 2002

Re: Need to build my own protocol handler..., Ben Greear, 01:58
Need to build my own protocol handler..., Markus Adolfsson, 01:51
Re: PATCH Re: udp weirdness, Eric Lemoine, 01:36
Re: RFC: cleaning up struct sk_buff before halloween, acme, 00:20

September 30, 2002

PATCH Re: udp weirdness, jamal, 19:29
Re: RFC: cleaning up struct sk_buff before halloween, David S. Miller, 18:01
RFC: cleaning up struct sk_buff before halloween, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, 17:54
Re: Copy patch for kernel 2.5.38, Andrew Morton, 17:20
RE: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Jon Fraser, 16:49
Copy patch for kernel 2.5.38, Mala Anand, 11:51
Re: [VLAN] VLAN patches, Ben Greear, 11:19
Re: [VLAN] VLAN patches, Ben Greear, 11:02
RE: [VLAN] VLAN patches, Dave Santucci, 10:56
Re: netlink sockets and rtm_newlink messages, kuznet, 10:44
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, kuznet, 09:58
Network interrupt pause problem in 2.5.38 kernel, Mala Anand, 08:51
Quixtar help, from me!, ur_business, 08:17
Re: udp weirdness, jamal, 07:31
Re: udp weirdness, jamal, 07:17
Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Alan Cox, 07:17
Re: udp weirdness, jamal, 06:17
Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, David S. Miller, 05:39
Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Martin Pool, 05:01
Re: [VLAN] VLAN patches, Matti Aarnio, 03:52
Re: udp weirdness, Eric Lemoine, 03:49
VLAN patches, Andersson Björn, 03:23
ipv6 implementation status ?, Seong Moon, 00:04
ipv6 implementation status ?, Seong Moon, 00:04

September 29, 2002

Re: [BK PATCH] Make eth.c independent of dev->hard_header_len, David S. Miller, 23:42
Re: [BK PATCH] Make eth.c independent of dev->hard_header_len, Jeff Garzik, 20:59
(ad)Strong WebRobot/eMailId Collector: Free Download !, herald, 20:29
Re: [BK PATCH] Make eth.c independent of dev->hard_header_len, David S. Miller, 20:03
Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Richard Gooch, 19:53
Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Benjamin LaHaise, 19:45
[BK/GNU] net driver 2.4.x series 7, Jeff Garzik, 19:01
[BK/GNU] net driver 2.4.x series 8, Jeff Garzik, 18:59
Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Richard Gooch, 15:54
Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Ben Greear, 14:33
Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Richard Gooch, 14:22
Re: [BK PATCH] Make eth.c independent of dev->hard_header_len, Kai Germaschewski, 14:09
Re: [BK PATCH] Make eth.c independent of dev->hard_header_len, Jeff Garzik, 13:45
[BK PATCH] Make eth.c independent of dev->hard_header_len, Kai Germaschewski, 13:35
Re: netlink sockets and rtm_newlink messages, jamal, 10:16
Re: udp weirdness, jamal, 09:55
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, Pekka Savola, 03:41
Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Richard Gooch, 01:34
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, David S. Miller, 01:29
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, David S. Miller, 01:27

September 28, 2002

Apresentação, Remover, 21:56
Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Ben Greear, 21:33
Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Xiaoliang \(David\) Wei, 21:12
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, kuznet, 21:10
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, Andi Kleen, 21:08
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, David S. Miller, 19:30
Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Richard Gooch, 17:58
Re: udp weirdness, Eric Lemoine, 15:53
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, kuznet, 15:47
[PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 01:20
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 00:52
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 00:38
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 00:27
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, Pekka Savola, 00:25
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 00:00

September 27, 2002

Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 23:45
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, Pekka Savola, 23:36
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 23:30
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 23:20
Re: [PATCH] khttpd crash fix, Marcelo Tosatti, 23:02
Re: [PATCH] khttpd crash fix, Marcelo Tosatti, 22:58
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, David S. Miller, 22:43
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 22:38
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, David S. Miller, 22:02
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 21:58
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, David S. Miller, 21:52
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, Andi Kleen, 21:34
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 21:29
Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification for Netfilter, David S. Miller, 20:37
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, David S. Miller, 20:35
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer, David S. Miller, 20:27
[PATCH] migrate ioctls upwards, Matthew Wilcox, 16:10
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 11:55
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer, kuznet, 11:40
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, Pekka Savola, 11:28
Re: Any effort to try to make IPv6 API more uniform?, Michael Richardson, 11:26
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 11:14
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet, 11:03
Re: udp weirdness, Eric Lemoine, 10:56
Re: netlink sockets and rtm_newlink messages, kuznet, 10:55
Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this, Ben Greear, 10:54
Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this, kuznet, 10:47
Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this, Ben Greear, 10:40
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer, kuznet, 10:30
[PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 10:17
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 10:16
Re: Linux problems with hundreds of interfaces/routes, Petr Baudis, 10:14
Re: udp weirdness, Matti Aarnio, 10:04
Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this, kuznet, 10:02
Re: udp weirdness, jamal, 10:00
Re: Linux problems with hundreds of interfaces/routes, kuznet, 09:49
Re: netlink sockets and rtm_newlink messages, jamal, 09:43
Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification for Netfilter, jamal, 09:19
Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification, jamal, 09:04
Re: netlink sockets and rtm_newlink messages, Patrick R. McManus, 08:47
Re: udp weirdness, Eric Lemoine, 07:01
Linux problems with hundreds of interfaces/routes, Petr Baudis, 06:43
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer, David S. Miller, 04:31
[PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 04:13
Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this, Ben Greear, 01:33
Any effort to try to make IPv6 API more uniform?, Pekka Savola, 01:00

September 26, 2002

Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this, kuznet, 22:36
Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification for Netfilter, Michael Richardson, 22:01
Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this, Ben Greear, 20:31
Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this, kuznet, 20:00
netlink sockets and rtm_newlink messages, Patrick R. McManus, 17:38
Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Don't Process ND Messages with Invalid Options, David S. Miller, 16:37
Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification for Netfilter, David S. Miller, 15:59
Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, David S. Miller, 15:53
Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification, Roberto Nibali, 15:48
Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification, Roberto Nibali, 15:22
[no subject], mdews, 13:40
Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification for Netfilter, James Morris, 11:19
Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification for Netfilter, James R. Leu, 10:42
Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification for Netfilter, James Morris, 10:28
Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, kuznet, 08:09
TR : Bug with NIC card Adlink PCI 8214 (Intel 82559 based) under linux, Gautier Harmel, 08:03
Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification, jamal, 07:10
Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Martin Pool, 00:49

September 25, 2002

Re: [Question] SMP for TCP/IP Stack, Nivedita Singhvi, 14:36
SPECWeb99 Data -- tcp-wakeups, Troy Wilson, 10:48
[PATCH] IPv6: Don't Process ND Messages with Invalid Options, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 00:52

September 24, 2002

Re: [Question] SMP for TCP/IP Stack, Ben Greear, 22:12
Re: [Question] SMP for TCP/IP Stack, Benjamin LaHaise, 21:35
[Question] SMP for TCP/IP Stack, Hyochang Nam, 21:27
udp weirdness, Eric Lemoine, 01:50

September 23, 2002

Re: skb->len, David S. Miller, 19:53
skb->len, Mazhar Memon, 19:36
Ricerca e Selezione, info, 19:07

September 20, 2002

Re: ALTPATCH: 8139cp: LinkChg support, Jeff Garzik, 08:16
Re: ALTPATCH: 8139cp: LinkChg support, Felipe W Damasio, 02:01
ALTPATCH: 8139cp: LinkChg support, Jeff Garzik, 01:10

September 19, 2002

PATCH: sundance #6, Jeff Garzik, 19:13
Re: Translation services - Services de traduction, Cedric Edwards, 18:57
Re: PATCH: sundance #5 (variable per-interface MTU support), Donald Becker, 17:23
PATCH: [my] sundance #5, Jeff Garzik, 16:31
Re: PATCH: sundance #5 (variable per-interface MTU support), Jeff Garzik, 16:22
Re: PATCH: sundance #4b, Jeff Garzik, 16:21
Re: PATCH: sundance #4a, Jeff Garzik, 16:20
PATCH: sundance #5 (variable per-interface MTU support), Jason Lunz, 15:59
PATCH: sundance #4b, Jason Lunz, 15:47
PATCH: sundance #4a, Jason Lunz, 15:46
PATCH: sundance #4, Jeff Garzik, 15:14
Re: PATCH: sundance #2, Jeff Garzik, 14:13
PATCH: sundance #3, Jeff Garzik, 13:13
Re: PATCH: sundance #2, Donald Becker, 12:24
PATCH: sundance #2, Jeff Garzik, 12:07
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Alan Cox, 10:43
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Eric W. Biederman, 10:13
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Eric W. Biederman, 10:08
Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c update, Donald Becker, 08:18
Translation services - Services de traduction, Deborah CABESSA, 07:54
Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c cleanups, Donald Becker, 07:54
Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c cleanups, Keith Owens, 02:08
Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c cleanups, Richard Gooch, 01:38
Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c update, Jeff Garzik, 01:29
help !, den, 00:20

September 18, 2002

Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c update, Jason Lunz, 23:51
[PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c update, Jeff Garzik, 23:20
Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c cleanups, Jason Lunz, 23:09
Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c cleanups, Richard Gooch, 22:48
Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time], Ben Greear, 22:00
Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time], David S. Miller, 21:05
Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time], Ben Greear, 21:02
Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time], David S. Miller, 20:33
Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Alexey Kuznetsov, 20:11
Re: PATCH Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jeff Garzik, 19:59
Re: PATCH Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jay Vosburgh, 19:51
Re: PATCH Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jeff Garzik, 19:44
PATCH Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jay Vosburgh, 19:19
Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time], Ben Greear, 18:15
Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time], David S. Miller, 17:59
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, David S. Miller, 16:27
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Alan Cox, 16:06
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, David S. Miller, 15:50
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Alan Cox, 15:34
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, David S. Miller, 15:28
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Alan Cox, 12:43
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Eric W. Biederman, 12:37
Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, jamal, 06:50
[PATCH] pktgen (link to non-busted patch this time), Ben Greear, 02:09
Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time], Ben Greear, 02:04
Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self, Ben Greear, 01:48
Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self, David S. Miller, 01:48
[PATCH] Networking: send-to-self, Ben Greear, 01:42
[PATCH] pktgen (1.6,-ben), Ben Greear, 01:35

September 17, 2002

Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Ben Greear, 23:02
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Jeff Garzik, 21:32
Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Martin Pool, 21:27
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Andrew Morton, 21:11
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, David S. Miller, 21:10
Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Martin Pool, 21:07
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Jeff Garzik, 21:06
Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, David S. Miller, 21:02
FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Martin Pool, 21:02
Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, jamal, 20:09
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, David S. Miller, 20:04
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, jamal, 20:00
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Andrew Morton, 16:54
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, David S. Miller, 16:53
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Jeff Garzik, 16:50
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, David S. Miller, 16:43
Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Andrew Morton, 16:40
[Fwd: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads], Andrew Morton, 16:30
Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPU load, Jeff Garzik, 15:40
Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jay Vosburgh, 15:33
Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Andrew Morton, 15:25
Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Andrew Morton, 15:19
Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jeff Garzik, 15:19
Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPU load, Jeff Garzik, 15:11
Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Chad N. Tindel, 15:06
Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jeff Garzik, 15:06
Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jeff Garzik, 15:02
Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPU load, Jay Vosburgh, 14:58
Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Chad N. Tindel, 14:53
Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Manfred Spraul, 14:49
Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Andrew Morton, 14:48
RE: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPU load, Jay Vosburgh, 14:42
RE: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPU load, Cureington, Tony, 14:24
Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Ben Greear, 11:39
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, jamal, 05:33
Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, jamal, 05:19

September 16, 2002

Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Jeff Garzik, 18:57
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 18:48
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Jeff Garzik, 18:44
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 18:06
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Jeff Garzik, 18:03
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David Woodhouse, 17:58
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 17:50
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David Woodhouse, 17:48
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 16:33
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, todd-lkml, 16:30
Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, David S. Miller, 16:23
Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Chris Friesen, 16:19
Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, David S. Miller, 16:08
Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Chris Friesen, 16:06
RE: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Yan-Fa Li, 15:08
Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, David S. Miller, 14:59
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 14:56
Networking, Facey Brian, 12:30
Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Ben Greear, 11:09
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, todd-lkml, 09:14
Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Chris Friesen, 08:19

September 15, 2002

Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 23:27
Re: packet re-ordering on SMP machines., Alexey Kuznetsov, 19:57
Re: [PATCH] Enable sending network traffic to local machine over external interfaces., Ben Greear, 15:36
Re: [PATCH] Enable sending network traffic to local machine over external interfaces., jamal, 15:25
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, jamal, 15:18
unregister_netdevice, usage count = 0, Ben Greear, 12:28
Re: packet re-ordering on SMP machines., Harald Welte, 03:42
[PATCH] Enable sending network traffic to local machine over external interfaces., Ben Greear, 01:39

September 14, 2002

Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPU load, Andrew Morton, 22:04
Bonding driver unreliable under high CPU load, Pascal Brisset, 11:33
Re: RFC 3041, Peter Bieringer, 07:14
TCP connection establishment question (send to self), Ben Greear, 01:11

September 13, 2002

Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Cacophonix, 17:17
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 17:08
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 17:08
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, todd-lkml, 16:57
US$ 6 Millones!!!, El Mensajero Millonario, 15:55
Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Boris Protopopov, 09:46
Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Chris Friesen, 09:26
RFC 3041, Stephen Waters, 09:02
Re: "Loopback" route through two cards?, Ben Greear, 00:39

September 12, 2002

Re: "Loopback" route through two cards?, Ben Greear, 23:55
more on forcing traffic to route to local interface though another interface., Ben Greear, 23:27
RE: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Feldman, Scott, 20:25
Make $20,000 with PayPal! Fast, reliable,FREE!!!, Your Friend, 18:50
Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, David S. Miller, 18:38
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 18:16
bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation, Boris Protopopov, 13:34
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 12:14
[PATCH] ebtables - Ethernet bridge tables, for 2.5.34, Bart De Schuymer, 12:01
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, todd-lkml, 09:39
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Alan Cox, 09:06
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Todd Underwood, 08:55
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, jamal, 07:33
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Todd Underwood, 02:26

September 11, 2002

Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Eric W. Biederman, 10:41
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 10:24
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 10:18
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Eric W. Biederman, 10:16
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 09:08
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Eric W. Biederman, 04:21
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Robert Olsson, 02:35

September 10, 2002

Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Manfred Spraul, 11:52
Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Mala Anand, 09:55
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Robert Olsson, 06:50
What happened with your forms processing idea?, Steve Kelly, 03:11

September 09, 2002

Japanese girl VS playboy, debian-hurd, 16:07
[no subject], Mala Anand, 12:46
IPV6_LEAVE_GROUP with ipv6mr_interface=0, Michael Bussmann, 10:32

September 08, 2002

Driver for TI ACX100 based card?, Ralf Baechle, 17:34

September 07, 2002

A WinXP patch, support, 08:49
URGENT ASSISTANCE, EDWARD MULETE, 06:54

September 06, 2002

Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Troy Wilson, 19:23
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 19:14
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Troy Wilson, 19:01
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 18:55
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Troy Wilson, 18:51
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Troy Wilson, 18:44
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Alan Cox, 15:24
New York Remembrance 911, Irmingard Anna, 15:03
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Gerrit Huizenga, 15:00
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 14:52
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Gerrit Huizenga, 14:48
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 14:42
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 14:41
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 14:37
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Manfred Spraul, 14:35
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 14:28
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 14:24
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Andi Kleen, 14:22
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 14:15
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 14:04
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Gerrit Huizenga, 14:01
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 14:01
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Gerrit Huizenga, 13:54
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 13:51
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 13:48
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 13:46
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Andi Kleen, 13:43
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 13:42
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 13:41
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 13:40
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 13:39
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 13:37
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Manfred Spraul, 13:30
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Dave Hansen, 13:29
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 13:24
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Gerrit Huizenga, 13:15
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 12:40
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Dave Hansen, 12:33
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Gerrit Huizenga, 12:22
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 11:27
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 11:17
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 11:08
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Dave Hansen, 10:35
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Robert Olsson, 10:30
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Dave Hansen, 10:26
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 09:34
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 09:26
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Robert Olsson, 06:33
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, jamal, 04:57
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 02:25
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Andrew Morton, 02:18
linux 2.2 TCP_CORK FIN_WAIT1 reproducible bug, Martin Pool, 02:07
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 01:55
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh, 01:46

September 05, 2002

Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 23:20
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 23:16
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 23:01
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 22:59
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller, 22:50
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 22:34
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, jamal, 20:50
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Dave Hansen, 17:58
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 17:44
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Nivedita Singhvi, 17:36
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Troy Wilson, 17:07
Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, jamal, 16:02
RE: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Feldman, Scott, 15:43
Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Troy Wilson, 13:26

September 04, 2002

Discounted Hotel Rooms, Discount Hotel Rooms, 17:44
Re: "Loopback" route through two cards?, Eric Lemoine, 04:22

September 03, 2002

Re: "Loopback" route through two cards?, kuznet, 07:52
Re: "Loopback" route through two cards?, jamal, 06:34
"Loopback" route through two cards?, Rusty Russell, 00:01

September 02, 2002

Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization, Mala Anand, 22:43
IPv6 MTU of a tunnel: 2 different switches, which wins?, Peter Bieringer, 02:06