Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr

netdev

Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags

from [kuznet]

To:	bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx (Benjamin LaHaise)
Subject:	Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags
From:	kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:06:13 +0400 (MSD)
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20020812190744.R1781@xxxxxxxxxx> from "Benjamin LaHaise" at Aug 12, 2 07:07:44 pm
Sender:	owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hello!

> Huh?  It's called from sock_alloc_send_skb, which is called from all 
> over the stack.

It is used with data_len==0. The branch generating fragments is dead.

Alexey

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags, Benjamin LaHaise Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags, kuznet Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags, Benjamin LaHaise Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags, kuznet <= Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags, Benjamin LaHaise Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags, kuznet

Previous by Date:	Re: raw ipv6 broken in 2.4.19, kuznet
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] connect() return value., kuznet
Previous by Thread:	Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags, Benjamin LaHaise
Next by Thread:	Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags, Benjamin LaHaise
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]