netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ICMPv6 ratelimiting, which /proc-settings related?

To: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: ICMPv6 ratelimiting, which /proc-settings related?
From: Peter Bieringer <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:07:46 +0200
Cc: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20020715.024401.17983126.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <17380000.1026547066@localhost> <20020715.024401.17983126.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx

--On Monday, July 15, 2002 02:44:01 AM +0900 "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki /
=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?=" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In article <17380000.1026547066@localhost> (at Sat, 13 Jul 2002
> 09:57:46 +0200), Peter Bieringer <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> says:
> 
>> extending my IPv6-howto with information about the /proc-FS I found
>> that there is no setting for ICMPv6 rate limiting.
> 
> icmpv6_xrlim_allow() controls rate limiting.
> 
> A variable named sysctl_icmpv6_time lives in net/ipv6/icmp.c, but
> sysctl does not exist in fact...

Oh, I found:

# grep icmpv6_time *
icmp.c:int sysctl_icmpv6_time = 1*HZ;
icmp.c:         int tmo = sysctl_icmpv6_time;


> Is introducing /proc/sys/net/ipv6/icmp/all/icmpv6_time reasonable?

Is HZ completly arch independed? Afair, it was CPU depended (like
grep HZ include/asm/param.h) shows.

Mho: Better name:

/proc/sys/net/ipv6/icmp/all/icmpv6_rate

I would suggest use of unit 1/s and run conversion internally.
Therfore
1 -> 1/s
10 -> 10/s
100 -> 100/s
0.1 -> 1/10s

        Peter



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>