netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets

To: ltd@xxxxxxxxx (Lincoln Dale)
Subject: Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets
From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 03:03:47 +0100 (BST)
Cc: vonbrand@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Horst von Brand), davem@xxxxxxxxxx (David S. Miller), greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ben Greear), linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.2.20020612221925.0283fb18@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Lincoln Dale" at Jun 12, 2002 10:28:15 PM
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> i know of many many folk who use transaction logs from HTTP caches for 
> volume-based billing.
> right now, those bills are anywhere between 10% to 25% incorrect.
> 
> you call that "extremely limited"?

It wouldnt help you anyway. Prove which frames were not due to the
overloading and congestion/errors on your network which therefore the customer 
should 
not have a duty to pay. Account for bitstuffing on HDLC links...

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>