[Cc:'s stripped]
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> Pekka Savola wrote:
> > Just to chime in my support (not that I don't think anyone needs it), I
> > think socket-based counters are An Extremely Bad Idea.
[...]
> If they are useful to some people, and have zero performance affect on others
> (due to being a configurable kernel feature), then what is your
> complaint?
That it adds code, which impacts _everybody_ futzing around in that area,
specially if it is a configurable option (this means multiplying the
possible configurations to be tested).
> I see two reasons left to dislike this feature:
>
> 1) General increase in #ifdef'd code. This actually seems like
> a pretty good argument, but I haven't seen anyone mention it
> specifically.
Right.
> 2) General dislike for a feature that one personally has no use for.
> Seems to be Dave's main (professed) excuse.
General dislike for adding features of _extremely_ limited (debugging!) use?
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
|