[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Network oops

To: george@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Network oops
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 22:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3D042F8F.72764243@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3D0390E2.1B80ADEE@xxxxxxxxxx> <20020609.213150.32126725.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3D042F8F.72764243@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
   From: george anzinger <george@xxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 21:48:15 -0700
   I would expect that the network code would recover from this
   sort of thing, so we are looking for a preempt issue at the
   moment.  Still, it could just be the way things work in the
   2.4.17 kernel so I thought I would ask.

Even though 2.4.17 is pretty old I still think it's a preempt

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>