| To: | george anzinger <george@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: System crash in tcp_fragment() |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 May 2002 14:54:52 +0200 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, niv@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3CE9F679.90ACF597@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205201836160.9301-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3CE9E466.AC2358EE@xxxxxxxxxx> <20020520.230021.29510217.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3CE9F679.90ACF597@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
> As for the fix, I would think that would be more up to the > network folks than me. Atomic is one option, but you can > also disable preemption. It is really light weight, and may > already be disabled in some of these cases. In most of them because it is running in a softirq. Just the user context stuff has a possible problem on non i386/x86-64. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: System crash in tcp_fragment(), kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: System crash in tcp_fragment(), george anzinger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: System crash in tcp_fragment(), george anzinger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: System crash in tcp_fragment(), Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |