| To: | d_vangreg <d.vangreg@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: kern-25-net-core-bug |
| From: | "Thomas 'Dent' Mirlacher" <dent@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 1 May 2002 20:35:37 +0200 (MET DST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200205011800.g41I0WwJ029694@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
--snip/snip
> I guessed (as errata): ret=handle_diverter(skb);
>
> & tried (as corrige): handle_diverter(skb);
well, a cleaner thing would be to set ret=0 or ret=
... but on the other hand, the return value for netif_receive_skb
isn't checked (at least in process_backlog)
btw. is someone auditing the network code?
- like check all return values from functions which could fail.
++dent
--
in some way i do, and in some way i don't.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | kern-25-net-core-bug, d_vangreg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Neighbor cache, Xiaoning He |
| Previous by Thread: | kern-25-net-core-bug, d_vangreg |
| Next by Thread: | Neighbor cache, Xiaoning He |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |