| To: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: suggestion for routing code improvement |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:05:19 +0200 |
| Cc: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Friesen <cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204111813500.5560-100000@l> |
| References: | <15541.41833.773161.740744@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204111813500.5560-100000@l> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Julian Anastasov writes: > > Interesting. At what rate of new connections/s did you test? > > It was on 100mbit, I already don't remember the exact tests > and number of clients, etc. The patch is archived ..., here it is. > You can try it yourself: > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/#testlvs > > Sorry that it does not have flood rate limits, use QoS in > the flooding host :) You can try the patch with different tools, > of course. Very intesting. Well seems like I don't get out of the lab until the snow comes.... We're testing GIGE switches now. With one Linux box with five e1000 we can put a background load of almost 5 Gbit/s into the switch. And check latencies through other pair of switch ports. Cheers. --ro |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: suggestion for routing code improvement, Julian Anastasov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Patch: Device operative state notification against 2.5.7, Stefan Rompf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: suggestion for routing code improvement, Julian Anastasov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: suggestion for routing code improvement, Nivedita Singhvi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |