[Top] [All Lists]

Re: I need sk_buff frag_list info.

To: andrew may <acmay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: I need sk_buff frag_list info.
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 01:54:34 +0100
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Mark Wisner <markwiz@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20020315164721.A1097@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <OF1B1A2F76.97320533-ON85256B7D.00695592@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020316013712.A10179@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020315164721.A1097@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 04:47:21PM -0800, andrew may wrote:
> So if you suggest to use ->frags should the skb->data be left alone? 
> I can see no way off knowing ahead of time wether the ptr's giving to
> hardware for a rx will be used for the start of a packet.

The headers should be in skb->data if possible. If not the stack will do some 
So you could put some arbitary first fragment (e.g. 128 bytes) there.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>