| To: | pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: addrconf.c - possible bug |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 10 Mar 2002 04:04:58 +0900 |
| Cc: | xs26-dev@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203081627570.8718-200000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20020308131131.GR2198@xxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203081627570.8718-200000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203081627570.8718-200000@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 8 Mar 2002 16:32:55 +0200 (EET)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> says: > differently: DAD starts from number X (X>0) decrementing it and RS start > from (assumed to be zero), incrementing it. Sending RSs only when DAD for link-local addresses has been completed on non-loopback interfaces, and addrconf_dad_completed() set ifp->probes 1. It sets addrconf_mod_timer() and addrconf_rs_timer() will resend RSs ifp->idev->cnf.rtr_solicits - 1 times. RS and DAD are not sent at the same time. --yoshfuji |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: addrconf.c - possible bug, Pekka Savola |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ipv4.o module, Dominic Duval |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: addrconf.c - possible bug, Petr Baudis |
| Next by Thread: | ipv4.o module, Dominic Duval |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |