| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: addrconf.c - possible bug |
| From: | Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 9 Mar 2002 20:40:17 +0200 (EET) |
| Cc: | xs26-dev@xxxxxxxx, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200203091803.VAA27059@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 9 Mar 2002 kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Pekka, please, reread the report; they talk about _neigbour_ _solicitations_. > They have nothing to do either with ifp->probes, RS, DA or with addrconf.c > at all. It is deal of ndisc.c/neghbour.c. Well, DAD *does* use neighbour solicitations. But the problem report was indeed rather unclear; at least tcpdumps would have been nice. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: addrconf.c - possible bug, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: addrconf.c - possible bug, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: addrconf.c - possible bug, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: addrconf.c - possible bug, Jan Oravec |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |