Re: your mail

netdev

Re: your mail

To:	Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@xxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: your mail
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 21:33:28 +0100
Cc:	kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, nivedita@xxxxxxxxxxx, hendriks@xxxxxxxx, matt@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<Pine.LNX.4.33.0202051234430.8565-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<200202051921.WAA01856@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202051234430.8565-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 12:37:39PM -0700, Ronald G Minnich wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > Such curcumstances just do not exist in the nature.
> 
> As far as you know. You have not seen it so do not believe it. I guess I
> have to disagree with you here :-)
> 
> "There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of ..."

Claiming something and not providing tcpdumps of it is at least highly
dubious.  I also have a hard time to see how delayed acks should 
introduce user visible delays (assuming your send/receive buffers are big 
enough) 

-Andi

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[no subject], Ronald G Minnich Re: your mail, kuznet Re: your mail, Ronald G Minnich Re: your mail, kuznet Re: your mail, Andi Kleen <= Re: your mail, Ronald G Minnich Re: your mail, Andi Kleen Re: your mail, Matt Sottile Re: your mail, Ronald G Minnich Re: your mail, Andi Kleen Andi's patch, Ronald G Minnich Re: Andi's patch, Andi Kleen Re: your mail, Muhammad Jaseemuddin Re: your mail, Matt Sottile

Previous by Date:	Re: your mail, kuznet
Next by Date:	Re: your mail, Ronald G Minnich
Previous by Thread:	Re: your mail, kuznet
Next by Thread:	Re: your mail, Ronald G Minnich
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]