[Top] [All Lists]

Re: your mail

To: Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: your mail
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 21:33:28 +0100
Cc: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, nivedita@xxxxxxxxxxx, hendriks@xxxxxxxx, matt@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
References: <> <>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 12:37:39PM -0700, Ronald G Minnich wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Such curcumstances just do not exist in the nature.
> As far as you know. You have not seen it so do not believe it. I guess I
> have to disagree with you here :-)
> "There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of ..."

Claiming something and not providing tcpdumps of it is at least highly
dubious.  I also have a hard time to see how delayed acks should 
introduce user visible delays (assuming your send/receive buffers are big 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>