netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PPP over socket?

To: fabrizio.gennari@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: PPP over socket?
From: Chris Dukes <pakrat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 01:12:07 +0000
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <OF89E28C88.FEBD33E7-ONC1256B3E.002E62B6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from fabrizio.gennari@xxxxxxxxxxx on Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 10:13:57AM +0100
References: <OF89E28C88.FEBD33E7-ONC1256B3E.002E62B6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 10:13:57AM +0100, fabrizio.gennari@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I was wondering whether the socket architecture could be modified in order 
> to support PPP connections over a generic socket (of type SOCK_DGRAM or 
> SOCK_SEQPACKET), by mapping each PPP packet to a socket packet. This idea 
> is not completely new: somebody raised is in the past, see for example 
> http://oss.sgi.com/projects/netdev/mail/netdev/msg00180.html or 
> http://oss.sgi.com/projects/netdev/mail/netdev/msg01127.html .

vtun already provides this capability in user space.
(See http://vtun.sourceforge.net/)
ppp(8) on *BSD also provides this capability in user space as well.

As memory serves PPPoE on Linux is partially implemented in userspace
as is, so a partial user space solution for PPPoUDP shouldn't be that
wretched.
-- 
Chris Dukes
"Bert is apparently EEEEVIL, whereas Oscar is just a sysadmin^Wgrouch."
-- gorski

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>