[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Restore ROUTE MASQ in 2.4

To: <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restore ROUTE MASQ in 2.4
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 21:49:21 +0200 (EET)
Cc: <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netfilter <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ja@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Hello!
> > multipath route has distinct paths but the lsrc solves this problem,
> What's about fwmark? Why it does not help?

        fwmark can be used for many things. For example, exactly in
such setups LVS can use it to mark the incoming traffic that should
be part of a virtual service. Then we can't use it to remember the
incoming path and then to route the in->out traffic based on it.
But may be it is possible, I still don't know the cost.

> Alexey


Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>