[Top] [All Lists]

Re: kfree_skb

To: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: kfree_skb
From: Chuck Winters <cwinters@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:43:16 -0500
In-reply-to: <20011210210842.A896@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:08:42PM -0200
Mail-followup-to: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20011210133840.A1534@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20011210210842.A896@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:08:42PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 01:38:40PM -0500, Chuck Winters escreveu:
> > Can bad things happen in 2.2 if you kfree_skb more than once?
> not if it matches the number of skb_get on it (or other operations that
> bump the skb refcount, dunno if it exists in 2.2, I'm looking at 2.4, that
> bumps the refcount at least in skb_recv_datagram) 8)
> - Arnaldo


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>