| To: | Chuck Winters <cwinters@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: kfree_skb |
| From: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Dec 2001 21:08:42 -0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20011210133840.A1534@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20011210133840.A1534@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.23i |
Em Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 01:38:40PM -0500, Chuck Winters escreveu: > Can bad things happen in 2.2 if you kfree_skb more than once? not if it matches the number of skb_get on it (or other operations that bump the skb refcount, dunno if it exists in 2.2, I'm looking at 2.4, that bumps the refcount at least in skb_recv_datagram) 8) - Arnaldo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | PACKET_MR_PROMISC doesn't set IFF_PROMISC, Yoann Vandoorselaere |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [RFC] cleaning up struct sock, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Previous by Thread: | kfree_skb, Chuck Winters |
| Next by Thread: | Re: kfree_skb, Chuck Winters |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |