| To: | Krzysztof Halasa <khc@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: SyncPPP vs. ppp_synctty |
| From: | Mårten Wikström <marten.wikstrom@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 17 Oct 2001 15:39:44 +0200 |
| Cc: | "\"''linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx \"' '" <linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "\"''netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx ' \"'" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <m3g08lylij.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <499AC99D205FD51197CD0002A574C4F8052416@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <m3g08lylij.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
mån 2001-10-15 klockan 17.24 skrev Krzysztof Halasa: > "Wikström, Mårten" <Marten.Wikstrom@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > But the ppp_generic requires a tty device, i.e. is character-oriented, where > > as the syncppp is network-oriented. Aren't they fundamentally different. How > > can they be merged? Wouldn't that require the network card to emulate a tty? > > PPP as a whole _is_ network-oriented. generic_ppp currently needs > a tty device, but I think it just should be changed to provide PPP > services to existing network devices as well. Then we are talking about at major change in ppp_generic, since it relies quite heavily on the tty paradigm. Or am I wrong? /Mårten |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Forcing 3c905 into halfduplex?, Donald Becker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | listing manual proxy ARP entries using "ip" command -- anyone, help?, Christopher Friesen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: SyncPPP vs. ppp_synctty, Krzysztof Halasa |
| Next by Thread: | OT: linux-pci mailing list, Bruce Allan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |