| To: | <mingo@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch] netconsole-2.4.10-B1 |
| From: | Richard Gooch <rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 1 Oct 2001 10:28:24 -0600 |
| Cc: | Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kenneth Johansson <ken@xxxxxxxx>, "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110010924380.3436-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200109301225.f8UCPXl16936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110010924380.3436-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Ingo Molnar writes:
[Much rationalising deleted:-]
> but telling any side to be wrong is stupid - both are correct, and
> the correct meaning of 'server' depends alot on context. this is why
> i defined the terms.
Hey! I didn't call anyone stupid. I didn't even call the idea
stupid. I think your terminology is backwards to the way I think and
what seems to be accepted practice (and I notice I'm not alone in
that).
However, "he who writes the code gets to choose", and I'd be a
hypocrite to say otherwise :-) I was just hoping to change your mind.
Regards,
Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Current: rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch] netconsole-2.4.10-B1, Oliver Xymoron |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch] netconsole-2.4.10-B1, Randy.Dunlap |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] netconsole-2.4.10-B1, Oliver Xymoron |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch] netconsole-2.4.10-B1, Randy.Dunlap |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |