| To: | ipng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: (usagi-users 00767) Re: source routing honored by hosts? |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 09 Sep 2001 23:09:56 +0900 |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109091459540.25161-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109011445490.19412-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109091459540.25161-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109091459540.25161-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Sun, 9 Sep 2001 15:55:21 +0300 (EEST)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> says: > There has not been an "official" statement on ipng IETF list on this, but > the general consensus seems to be that hosts should not forward > source-routed frames, at least by default. Who did say that it should be disabled by default? Consensus seems to be "hosts are expected to forward source-routed frames by default." ...or, do I misunderstand something? We need the conclusion of this discussion... -- yoshfuji |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: source routing honored by hosts?, Pekka Savola |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Promiscuous and Multicast semantics, Donald Becker |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: source routing honored by hosts?, Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: (usagi-users 00767) Re: source routing honored by hosts?, Pekka Savola |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |