| To: | pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx (Pekka Savola) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: (usagi-users 00728) Re: [Patch 2of2] IPv6 routers don't join/leave |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:03:27 +0400 (MSK DST) |
| Cc: | dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx, usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108291121220.23632-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> from "Pekka Savola" at Aug 29, 1 11:36:56 am |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > Do you remember this/care to comment on the ideas, Alexey? Seems, I have already commented on this... Probably, I understand current problem incorrectly. So, elaborate, please. We do not have any flag, which blocks forwarding of packets received on some interface. This is duty of firewall. We do have such flag for IPv4, because this functionality is obtained gratuitously and it is silly not to accept donations. :-) What's about all the rest, all these things may/should be controlled by different flags. Even combination "send RAs" + "but do not forward" is not illegal. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | ICMP Destination Unreachable Message not conforming to standards?, gmarran |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: (usagi-users 00728) Re: [Patch 2of2] IPv6 routers don't join/leave, David Stevens |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: (usagi-users 00728) Re: [Patch 2of2] IPv6 routers don't join/leave the all routers group, Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | setting ip address from within driver, Bjoern A. Zeeb |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |