| To: | greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPTOS_LOWDELAY in netinet/ip.h is incorrect?? |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Aug 2001 08:46:38 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3B77F5B8.B43EA7CD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3B7748B0.C897121A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010813.071436.74751236.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3B77F5B8.B43EA7CD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 08:43:52 -0700 I wasn't passing values to setsockopt in network byte order, but it doesn't look like I should: Do you agree? Ummm... "byte order" doesn't matter when you're passing in just a byte. :-) As for examples of programs which set a specific TOS, you might want to look into the sources of obscure unknown programs such as telnet et al. Later, David S. Miller davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: IPTOS_LOWDELAY in netinet/ip.h is incorrect??, Ben Greear |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPTOS_LOWDELAY in netinet/ip.h is incorrect??, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IPTOS_LOWDELAY in netinet/ip.h is incorrect??, Ben Greear |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPTOS_LOWDELAY in netinet/ip.h is incorrect??, Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |