| To: | Imran Patel <ipatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPv6 fragmentation and IPv6 header parsing |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Aug 2001 13:38:39 +0200 |
| Cc: | Brad Chapman <kakadu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <003801c11b15$4fb35320$4d61a4ca@zombie>; from ipatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 11:07:58AM +0530 |
| References: | <200107312208.CAA00330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <003801c11b15$4fb35320$4d61a4ca@zombie> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 11:07:58AM +0530, Imran Patel wrote: > On the contrary, it might be useful for transition from IPv4 to IPv6 ;-) > IPv6 connection tracking is useful for NAT-PT. However, other options on top > of IPv6 conntrack like masquerading, v6-v6 NAT, etc look useless and silly. You forget real world. I bet ISPs will continue to only give a single IPv6 address to their dialup customers, so masquerading will stay ... Ralf |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Linux 2.4 network performance oddities, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPv6 fragmentation and IPv6 header parsing, Michael Richardson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IPv6 fragmentation and IPv6 header parsing, Michael Richardson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPv6 fragmentation and IPv6 header parsing, Michael Richardson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |