| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: ethtool MII helpers |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:34:59 +1200 |
| Cc: | Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3B32D694.CACF46D0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 01:24:36AM -0400 |
| References: | <3B23AFC3.71CE2FD2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010622171037.D2576@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3B32D694.CACF46D0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 01:24:36AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Sure, and that's planned. Wanna send me a patch for it? :)
Possibly, but I wonder if this is a kernel-space problem or not. Why
not put all the smarts into userland for it?
It will definitely fall back on the MII ioctls if ethtool media
support for the desired command doesn't exist.
Well, that is more or less as much as needs to be done. That, and
some kind of super-set API to be defined for all new stuff, having
two slightly different APIs for the same things sucks.
--cw
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: PATCH: ethtool MII helpers, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PATCH: ethtool MII helpers, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH: ethtool MII helpers, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH: ethtool MII helpers, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |