| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: ethtool MII helpers |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:10:37 +1200 |
| Cc: | Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3B23AFC3.71CE2FD2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 01:34:59PM -0400 |
| References: | <3B23AFC3.71CE2FD2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 01:34:59PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Initial draft of a helper which uses generic elements present in several
net drivers to implement ethtool ioctl support in a minimum amount of
code.
I have included a sample implementation in the epic100 driver, to
illustrate how these helpers may be used. This should make it easier to
implement support across 10/100 hardware which uses primarily an MII
phy.
Comments appreciated.
Can someone explain to me why we have ethtool and mii-tool? Can we
not extend ethtool for the mii-tool stuff, even if only at userland?
--cw
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | net driver directory moves for 2.5, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PATCH: ethtool MII helpers, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH: ethtool MII helpers, Bogdan Costescu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH: ethtool MII helpers, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |