Re: per-route arp control

netdev

Re: per-route arp control

To:	Andrey Savochkin <saw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: per-route arp control
From:	Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 10 Jun 2001 12:29:14 +0000 (GMT)
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ak@xxxxxx>, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:	<20010608111211.B29098@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx

        Hello,

On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Andrey Savochkin wrote:

> Ok, I see what you mean.
> rt_src is not always pref_src, it is the address that is used for this
> particular flow.  And that creating special exceptions for flows that has the
> shared IP as the local source looks a bit inconvenient for you.
>
> Let me think a bit...

        ok, I'll make more tests but for now nothing new from me.

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: per-route arp control, Andrey Savochkin Re: per-route arp control, Julian Anastasov Re: per-route arp control, Julian Anastasov <=

Previous by Date:	Re: PATCH: Path MTU discovery fix, David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Q: (ab)using zerocopy for drivers with alignment contraints, Manfred Spraul
Previous by Thread:	Re: per-route arp control, Julian Anastasov
Next by Thread:	PATCH: Path MTU discovery fix, Daiki Ueno
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]